Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Elevator algorithm
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about The Elevator Algorithm totally explained

The elevator algorithm (also SCAN) is a disk scheduling algorithm to determine the motion of the disk's arm and head in servicing read and write requests.
   This algorithm is named after the behavior of a building elevator, where the elevator continues to travel in its current direction (up or down) until empty, stopping only to let individuals off or to pick up new individuals heading in the same direction.
   From an implementation perspective, the drive maintains a buffer of pending read/write requests, along with the associated cylinder number of the request. Lower cylinder numbers indicate that the cylinder is closest to the spindle, and higher numbers indicate the cylinder is further away.

Description

When a new request arrives while the drive is idle, the initial arm/head movement will be in the direction of the cylinder where the data is stored, either in or out. As additional requests arrive, requests are serviced only in the current direction of arm movement until the arm reaches the last request, then the arm turns and services the requests in the new direction. When this happens, the direction of the arm reverses, and the requests that were remaining in the opposite direction are serviced, and so on.

Variations

One variation of this method ensures all requests are serviced in only one direction, that is, once the head has arrived at the outer edge of the disk, it returns to the beginning and services the new requests in this one direction only (or vice versa). This is known as the "Circular Elevator Algorithm" or C-SCAN. This results in more equal performance for all head positions, as the expected distance from the head is always half the maximum distance, unlike in the standard elevator algorithm where cylinders in the middle will be serviced as much as twice as often as the innermost or outermost cylinders.
   Other variations include:

Example

The following is an example of how to calculate average disk seek times for both the SCAN and C-SCAN algorithms.
  • Example list of pending disk requests (listed by track number): 100, 50, 10, 20, 75.
  • The starting track number for the examples will be 35.
  • The list will need to be sorted in ascending order: 10, 20, 50, 75, 100. Both SCAN and C-SCAN behave in the same manner until they reach the last track queued. For the sake of this example let us assume that the SCAN algorithm is currently going from a lower track number to a higher track number (like the C-SCAN is doing). For both methods, one takes the difference in magnitude (for example absolute value) between the next track request and the current track.
  • Seek 1 : 50 - 35 = 15
  • Seek 2 : 75 - 50 = 25
  • Seek 3 : 100 - 75 = 25 At this point both have reached the highest (end) track request. SCAN will just reverse direction and service the next closest disk request (in this example, 20) and C-SCAN will always go back to track 0 and start going to higher track requests.
  • Seek 4 (SCAN) : 20 - 100 = 80
  • Seek 5 (SCAN) : 10 - 20 = 10
  • Total (SCAN) : 155
  • Average (SCAN) : 155 / 5 = 31
  • Seek 4 (C-SCAN) : 0 - 100 = 100 // c-scan always goes back to the first track
  • Seek 5 (C-SCAN) : 10 - 0 = 10
  • Seek 6 (C-SCAN) : 20 - 10 = 10
  • Total (C-SCAN) : 185
  • Average (C-SCAN) : 185 / 5 = 37 Note: Even though six seeks were performed using the C-SCAN algorithm, only five I/Os were actually done.

    Analysis

    The arm movement is thus always less than twice the number of total cylinders then, for both versions of the elevator algorithm. The variation has the advantage to have a smaller variance in response time. The algorithm is also relatively simple.
       However, the elevator algorithm isn't always better than Shortest seek first, which is slightly closer to optimal, but can result in high variance in response time and even in starvation when new requests continually get serviced prior to existing requests.
       Anti-starvation techniques can be applied to the shortest seek time first algorithm to guarantee an optimum response time. See also
  • FCFS
  • FSCAN
  • LOOK
  • N-Step-SCAN
  • Shortest seek time firstFurther Information

    Get more info on 'Elevator Algorithm'.


    External Link Exchanges

    Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

      <a href="http://elevator_algorithm.totallyexplained.com">Elevator algorithm Totally Explained</a>

    Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
       As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



  • Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
    This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Elevator algorithm (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version